The EAL is seeking RDNs and NDTRs who work with patients, clients, or the public to treat children and adolescents living with type 1 diabetes, for participation in a usability test and focus group. Interested participants should email a professional resume to dhandu@eatright.org by July 15, 2024.

Energy Expenditure (EE) Systematic Review (2013-2014)

Energy Expenditure (EE) Systematic Review (2013-2014): Grade Chart

You can view a dynamic graph showing the percentage of grades in each category (Grade I, II, III, IV, V) for this project. To see which evidence analysis conclusion statements received a particular grade, simply click on that part of the dynamic graph.

Grades are assigned to indicate the overall strength or weakness of evidence informing the conclusion statement.

Loading Chart...

Grade I means there is Good evidence supporting the statement;
Grade II is Fair;
Grade III is Limited;
Grade IV is Expert Opinion;
Grade V is Not Assignable.

For a more detailed explanation of the meaning of the grades, click here.